Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

digital black and white photography

slyth_vs_huff_L2018728
slytherin vs hufflepuff

For the second time in a day, I’ve been asked about color versions of my black and white photographs.

shells_vs_shEvil_L2019818
Santa Cruz Boardwalk Bomshells vs San Francisco ShEvil Dead 

huff_vs_slyth_L2018086
hufflepuff vs slytherin signing in.

I’m going to tell you a little story-slash-mansplain you something about black and white photography.

Salem capitol building at night
Salem capitol building at night

In my senior year in college, I took some fun courses. A couple of painting courses and a black and white photography course.  It wasn’t like the physics and math courses I was taking weren’t fun. They were fun, but in a different way.

umbrella
umbrella

Back in those days, Kodak offered a black and white film called T-MAX, a very fine grained black and white film.  I wasn’t so crazy about T-MAX.  I preferred Kodak’s Tri-X, precisely because it offered a fatter grain that covered up the smaller dust spots on the film.  And I hated dust spots.

hydrant
hydrant

I STILL HATE DUST SPOTS.

So, this is how it worked.  You loaded the camera with the black and white film. You shot the roll of black and white film.  You put the roll of film in a little metal light proof canister and then filled the canister with a series of chemical solutions which would “develop” the film.  You dry the film negatives, hoping and praying that water spots or dust wouldn’t form on the film as it was drying.

Portland Mounted Patrol

Now, to make a print, you take your film negative and put it in an enlarger, which illuminated black and white photographic paper. You take the exposed paper and run it through the same series of chemical solutions to produce a black and white print.  You dry the print, and hope and pray that it doesn’t gather too much dust or curl too much.

Wow, that’s a great photograph, Mark, can I have the color version?

The color version of a photograph made with black and white film does not exist.

In the olden days (like 1915 before color film existed or before color film was widely available) to make a color photograph meant that you took a black and white print and applied watercolor paint to it. Or pastel chalk to it. Or colored pencils to it to make a color photograph illustration.

Today, there are a handful of companies that sell black and white digital cameras.  These cameras do not have any hardware or software that “see” colors.  (Look up Bayer filter on Wikipedia for a tutorial on how most digital cameras “see” color).  The only colors digital black and white cameras see are Black.  And White. And all the Grays in between. 

SHE IS DANYMITE!
SHE IS DANYMITE!

I do not own an IQ3 100 megapixel Achromatic sold by Phase One.  I just own a Leica.

groms_vs_mayhem_L2019675
Santa Cruz Derby Groms vs California Mayhem

Most of the black and white photos I’ve published on flickr in the past 5 years or so have been taken with a black and white digital camera.  The color versions of those photos do not exist. 

ShEvil_vs_Oakland_L2013809
San Francisco ShEvil Dead vs Oakland Outlaws

To make a color photograph out of a digital black and white photograph would require you to put it in Photoshop (or some equivalent software) and paint colors on top of the black and white photograph.  

ShEvil_vs_Oakland_L2013630
San Francisco ShEvil Dead vs Oakland Outlaws

There are people that have the skills to turn black and white photos into color photos. I don’t know if I know any of them (ask Ted Turner for  references, I’m sure he knows people).  I do not possess the skills to turn a black and white photo into a color photograph. And I do not possess the motivation to learn how to turn a black and white photo into a color photograph.


holiday_parade_L2019001
Santa Cruz Holiday Parade 2017

No comments: